top of page

NEW TECH FOODS

Legal

South Dakota legislative landscape features clash over lab-grown meat regulations

FoodBev Media logo.png

Siân Yates

12 February 2025

South Dakota legislative landscape features clash over lab-grown meat regulations

Placeholder.png

South Dakota is following in the footsteps of other US states, joining a growing movement to regulate lab-grown meat as lawmakers grapple with the implications of this emerging technology on traditional agriculture.


The South Dakota Legislature is witnessing a contentious debate over lab-grown meat, reflecting broader tensions within the agricultural community.


A recent committee vote has advanced a proposed ban on the production, sale and distribution of lab-grown meat in the state, complicating an earlier bipartisan effort that sought to mandate clear labelling for such products.


Last week, the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee approved the ban by a narrow margin of 8-5. This decision follows the passage of a labeling bill, which is currently awaiting the governor's approval. The labelling initiative, which garnered support from both sides of the aisle, aims to ensure consumers are informed about the nature of lab-grown meat, often referred to as cell-cultured or cultivated meat.


The legislative discourse highlights a divide among farmers and ranchers in South Dakota. South Dakota Searchlight reported that Republican Rep. Jana Hunt, a rancher from Dupree, articulated the concerns of many in the agricultural community, asserting that lab-grown meat poses an existential threat to traditional livestock farming.


"We need meat that can stand on its own feet," she remarked, noting the perceived risks associated with the new technology and its implications for food safety.


Conversely, some agricultural representatives argue against the ban, suggesting it undermines consumer choice.


Matthew Bogue, a lobbyist for the South Dakota Farm Bureau Federation, voiced his opposition to the proposed legislation: “This is the government telling consumers who can and cannot purchase this product, and picking winners and losers”.


His comments reflect a growing sentiment among certain producers who advocate for market-driven solutions rather than regulatory restrictions.


The proposed ban is not isolated; similar legislative measures have emerged in states like Florida and Alabama, where bans have led to legal challenges from industry stakeholders.


In South Dakota, the legislative package includes another bill aimed at restricting state funding for lab-grown meat initiatives, with exceptions for public universities. Rep. Hunt has highlighted concerns over potential state support for lab-grown meat production, particularly regarding economic development grants.


#SouthDakota #US #labelling #regulation #cultivatedmeat #legal #banning

Related news

Placeholder.png

Podcast: Exploring the impact of the new C-Label and F-Label

We explore the impact of V-Label's new certifications for foods made with advanced cell cultivation and fermentation technologies.

Placeholder.png

The F-Label: Bridging the gap between innovation and consumer trust in animal-free fermentation

The Cell Base spoke to Renato Pichler, V-Label founder, to find out more about the implications of this new fermentation labelling system.

Placeholder.png

South Dakota lawmakers advance bill for clear labelling of lab-grown meat

This week, a committee of South Dakota legislators unanimously approved a bill aimed at defining, labelling and regulating lab-grown meat.

Placeholder.png

The C-Label: Paving the way for trust and transparency in cultivated meat

The introduction of the C-label sets a new standard for transparency, as Martin Ranniger, director of ProVeg Czechia, told The Cell Base.

Legal

South Dakota legislative landscape features clash over lab-grown meat regulations

FoodBev Media logo.png

Siân Yates

12 February 2025

bottom of page